|
[oracle@roger ~]$ sqlplus "/as sysdba"
SQL*Plus: Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production on Sun Aug 28 17:17:45 2011
Copyright (c) 1982, 2007, Oracle. All Rights Reserved.
Connected to an idle instance.
SQL> startup
ORACLE instance started.
Total System Global Area 167772160 bytes
Fixed Size 1266392 bytes
Variable Size 71306536 bytes
Database Buffers 92274688 bytes
Redo Buffers 2924544 bytes
Database mounted.
Database opened.
SQL> create user text_idx identified by text_idx;
User created.
SQL>
SQL> grant resource ,connect,ctxapp to text_idx;
Grant succeeded.
SQL>
SQL> GRANT EXECUTE ON CTXSYS.CTX_CLS TO text_idx;
GRANT EXECUTE ON CTXSYS.CTX_DDL TO text_idx;
GRANT EXECUTE ON CTXSYS.CTX_DOC TO text_idx;
GRANT EXECUTE ON CTXSYS.CTX_OUTPUT TO text_idx;
GRANT EXECUTE ON CTXSYS.CTX_QUERY TO text_idx;
GRANT EXECUTE ON CTXSYS.CTX_REPORT TO text_idx;
GRANT EXECUTE ON CTXSYS.CTX_THES TO text_idx;
GRANT EXECUTE ON CTXSYS.CTX_ULEXER TO text_idx;
Grant succeeded.
SQL>
Grant succeeded.
SQL>
Grant succeeded.
SQL>
Grant succeeded.
SQL>
Grant succeeded.
SQL>
Grant succeeded.
SQL>
Grant succeeded.
SQL>
Grant succeeded.
SQL>
SQL> conn text_idx/text_idx
Connected.
SQL> CREATE TABLE docs (id NUMBER PRIMARY KEY, text VARCHAR2(500));
Table created.
SQL> INSERT INTO docs VALUES(1, 'http://www.itpub.net/thread-1475450-1-1.html');
1 row created.
SQL> INSERT INTO docs VALUES(2, 'http://www.yesky.com/285/1942785_1.shtml');
INSERT INTO docs VALUES(3, 'http://www.baidu.com/s?tn=chenly082=4391');
1 row created.
SQL> INSERT INTO docs VALUES(4, 'file:///D:/oracle---官方文檔/B19306_01/B19306_01/text.102/b14217/quicktour.htmi1008362');
1 row created.
SQL>
INSERT INTO docs VALUES(5, 'file:///D:/oracle---官方文檔/B19306_01/B19306_01/text.10
1 row created.
SQL> 2/b14217/acase.htm#g637598');
INSERT INTO docs VALUES(6, 'http://database.51cto.com/art/201104/252898.htm');
1 row created.
SQL>
1 row created.
SQL>
SQL> commit;
Commit complete.
SQL> select count(*) from docs;
COUNT(*)
----------
6
SQL> col text for a50
SQL> set lines 120
SQL> SELECT id, text FROM docs WHERE CONTAINS(text, 'baidu', 1) > 0;
SQL>
SQL> set autot traceonly
SQL> SELECT id, text FROM docs WHERE CONTAINS(text, 'baidu', 1) > 0;
Execution Plan
----------------------------------------------------------
Plan hash value: 3588628665
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 277 | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 1 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| DOCS | 1 | 277 | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 2 | DOMAIN INDEX | IDX_DOCS | | | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 |
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
---------------------------------------------------
2 - access("CTXSYS"."CONTAINS"("TEXT",'baidu',1)>0)
Note
-----
- dynamic sampling used for this statement
Statistics
----------------------------------------------------------
11 recursive calls
0 db block gets
18 consistent gets
0 physical reads
0 redo size
500 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
400 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
1 rows processed
SQL> create sequence seq_docs
2 minvalue 1
3 nomaxvalue
4 start with 7
5 increment by 1
6 nocycle
7 cache 10;
Sequence created.
SQL> begin
2 for i in 1..100 loop
3 INSERT INTO docs(id, text) VALUES(seq_docs.NEXTVAL, 'http://www.killdb.com/');
4 INSERT INTO docs(id, text) VALUES(seq_docs.NEXTVAL, 'http://www.killdb.com/?p=210');
5 INSERT INTO docs(id, text) VALUES(seq_docs.NEXTVAL, 'http://www.killdb.com/?p=216');
6 INSERT INTO docs(id, text) VALUES(seq_docs.NEXTVAL, 'http://www.killdb.com/?p=201');
7 INSERT INTO docs(id, text) VALUES(seq_docs.NEXTVAL, 'http://www.killdb.com/?p=196');
8 INSERT INTO docs(id, text) VALUES(seq_docs.NEXTVAL, 'http://www.killdb.com/?p=219');
9 commit;
10 end loop;
11 end;
12 /
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL>
SQL>
SQL> select count(*) from docs;
COUNT(*)
----------
606
SQL> begin
2 for i in 1..1000 loop
3 INSERT INTO docs(id, text) VALUES(seq_docs.NEXTVAL, 'http://www.killdb.com/');
4 INSERT INTO docs(id, text) VALUES(seq_docs.NEXTVAL, 'http://www.killdb.com/?p=210');
5 INSERT INTO docs(id, text) VALUES(seq_docs.NEXTVAL, 'http://www.killdb.com/?p=216');
6 INSERT INTO docs(id, text) VALUES(seq_docs.NEXTVAL, 'http://www.killdb.com/?p=201');
7 INSERT INTO docs(id, text) VALUES(seq_docs.NEXTVAL, 'http://www.killdb.com/?p=196');
8 INSERT INTO docs(id, text) VALUES(seq_docs.NEXTVAL, 'http://www.killdb.com/?p=219');
9 INSERT INTO docs(id, text) VALUES(seq_docs.NEXTVAL, 'http://www.killdb.com/?p=205');
10 INSERT INTO docs(id, text) VALUES(seq_docs.NEXTVAL, 'http://www.killdb.com/?p=206');
11 INSERT INTO docs(id, text) VALUES(seq_docs.NEXTVAL, 'http://www.killdb.com/?p=207');
12 INSERT INTO docs(id, text) VALUES(seq_docs.NEXTVAL, 'http://www.killdb.com/?p=199');
13 INSERT INTO docs(id, text) VALUES(seq_docs.NEXTVAL, 'http://www.killdb.com/?p=208');
14 commit;
15 end loop;
16 end;
17 /
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL>
SQL> select count(*) from docs;
COUNT(*)
----------
11606
SQL>
SQL> set timing on
SQL> begin
2 for i in 1..10000 loop
3 INSERT INTO docs(id, text) VALUES(seq_docs.NEXTVAL, 'http://www.killdb.com/');
4 INSERT INTO docs(id, text) VALUES(seq_docs.NEXTVAL, 'http://www.killdb.com/?p=210');
5 INSERT INTO docs(id, text) VALUES(seq_docs.NEXTVAL, 'http://www.killdb.com/?p=216');
6 INSERT INTO docs(id, text) VALUES(seq_docs.NEXTVAL, 'http://www.killdb.com/?p=201');
7 INSERT INTO docs(id, text) VALUES(seq_docs.NEXTVAL, 'http://www.killdb.com/?p=196');
8 INSERT INTO docs(id, text) VALUES(seq_docs.NEXTVAL, 'http://www.killdb.com/?p=219');
9 INSERT INTO docs(id, text) VALUES(seq_docs.NEXTVAL, 'http://www.killdb.com/?p=205');
10 INSERT INTO docs(id, text) VALUES(seq_docs.NEXTVAL, 'http://www.killdb.com/?p=206');
11 INSERT INTO docs(id, text) VALUES(seq_docs.NEXTVAL, 'http://www.killdb.com/?p=207');
12 INSERT INTO docs(id, text) VALUES(seq_docs.NEXTVAL, 'http://www.killdb.com/?p=199');
13 INSERT INTO docs(id, text) VALUES(seq_docs.NEXTVAL, 'http://www.killdb.com/?p=208');
14 commit;
15 end loop;
16 end;
17 /
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
Elapsed: 00:03:43.23
SQL>
SQL> select count(*) from docs;
COUNT(*)
----------
121606
Elapsed: 00:00:00.05
SQL>
SQL> select count(*) from docs where CONTAINS(text,'p=210') > 0;
COUNT(*)
----------
0
SQL> select count(*) from docs where CONTAINS(text,'killdb') >0;
COUNT(*)
----------
0
SQL> EXEC CTX_DDL.SYNC_INDEX('idx_docs', '5m');
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> select count(*) from docs where CONTAINS(text,'p=210') > 0;
COUNT(*)
----------
110500
SQL>
SQL> SELECT count(*) FROM docs WHERE CONTAINS(text,'killdb') > 0;
COUNT(*)
----------
121600
從這里看出 同步index的重要性了,下面來創(chuàng)建job 來進(jìn)行定期的同步index以及優(yōu)化。
SQL> create or replace procedure sync_idx_docs as
2 begin
3 ctx_ddl.sync_index('idx_docs');
4 end;
5 /
Procedure created.
SQL> VARIABLE job_no number;
SQL> BEGIN
2 DBMS_JOB.SUBMIT(:job_no,'sync_idx_docs();',
3 SYSDATE, 'SYSDATE + 1');
4 commit;
5 END;
6 /
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> create or replace procedure optimize_idx_docs as
2 begin
3 ctx_ddl.optimize_index('idx_docs','FULL');
4 end;
5 /
Procedure created.
SQL> VARIABLE job_no number;
SQL> BEGIN
2 DBMS_JOB.SUBMIT(:job_no,'optimize_idx_docs();',
3 SYSDATE, 'SYSDATE + 1');
4 commit;
5 END;
6 /
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL>
SQL> col INTERVAL for a25
SQL> select JOB,LOG_USER,SCHEMA_USER,INTERVAL,LAST_DATE from user_jobs;
JOB LOG_USER SCHEMA_USER INTERVAL LAST_DATE
---------- ------------- --------------- ---------------- ---------
21 TEXT_IDX TEXT_IDX SYSDATE + 1 28-AUG-11
22 TEXT_IDX TEXT_IDX SYSDATE + 1 28-AUG-11
---啟動(dòng)如上2個(gè)job任務(wù)
SQL> execute dbms_job.run(21);
execute dbms_job.run(22);
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL>
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL>
SQL> alter table docs add owner varchar2(10);
Table altered.
SQL> update docs set owner='Roger';
121606 rows updated.
SQL> commit;
Commit complete.
SQL>
下面來測(cè)試，如果表docs dml操作比較頻繁，那么對(duì)于select語句來說，是否有較大的影響？
SQL> select /*+ no_index(docs SYS_C005195)*/
2 count(*)
3 from docs
4 where contains(text, 'p=199') > 0
5 and id > 10500
6 and id < 10800;
Elapsed: 00:00:00.09
Execution Plan
----------------------------------------------------------
Plan hash value: 1092983528
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 277 | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 1 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | 277 | | |
|* 2 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| DOCS | 1 | 277 | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 3 | DOMAIN INDEX | IDX_DOCS | | | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
---------------------------------------------------
2 - filter("ID">10500 AND "ID"<10800)
3 - access("CTXSYS"."CONTAINS"("TEXT",'p=199')>0)
Note
-----
- dynamic sampling used for this statement
---session 1
SQL> show user
USER is "TEXT_IDX"
SQL> begin
2 for i in 1 .. 15000 loop
3 if mod(i, 2) = 0 then
4 update docs
5 set owner = 'killdb'
6 where id = i
7 and id > 10000
8 and id < 15000;
9 commit;
10 end if;
11 end loop;
12 commit;
13 end;
14 /
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
---session 2
SQL> select /*+ no_index(docs SYS_C005195)*/
2 id,owner,text
3 from docs
4 where contains(text, 'p=199') > 0
5 and id > 10700
6 and id < 10800;
90 rows selected.
Elapsed: 00:00:00.19
Statistics
----------------------------------------------------------
13 recursive calls
0 db block gets
17447 consistent gets
0 physical reads
1024 redo size
4691 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
455 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
7 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
90 rows processed
SQL> /
90 rows selected.
Elapsed: 00:00:00.35
Statistics
----------------------------------------------------------
13 recursive calls
0 db block gets
21322 consistent gets
0 physical reads
0 redo size
4689 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
455 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
7 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
90 rows processed
SQL> /
/90 rows selected.
Elapsed: 00:00:00.76
Statistics
----------------------------------------------------------
13 recursive calls
0 db block gets
19518 consistent gets
0 physical reads
1856 redo size
4689 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
455 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
7 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
90 rows processed
SQL>
90 rows selected.
Elapsed: 00:00:00.37
Statistics
----------------------------------------------------------
13 recursive calls
0 db block gets
15409 consistent gets
0 physical reads
0 redo size
4689 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
455 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
7 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
90 rows processed
SQL> /
90 rows selected.
Elapsed: 00:00:00.30
Statistics
----------------------------------------------------------
13 recursive calls
0 db block gets
20226 consistent gets
0 physical reads
64 redo size
4689 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
455 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
7 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
90 rows processed
SQL> /
90 rows selected.
Elapsed: 00:00:00.32
Statistics
----------------------------------------------------------
13 recursive calls
0 db block gets
17881 consistent gets
0 physical reads
0 redo size
4689 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
455 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
7 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
90 rows processed
SQL> /
90 rows selected.
Elapsed: 00:00:00.42
Statistics
----------------------------------------------------------
13 recursive calls
0 db block gets
15728 consistent gets
0 physical reads
0 redo size
4689 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
455 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
7 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
90 rows processed
SQL> /
90 rows selected.
Elapsed: 00:00:00.49
Statistics
----------------------------------------------------------
13 recursive calls
0 db block gets
17406 consistent gets
0 physical reads
0 redo size
4689 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
455 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
7 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
90 rows processed
SQL> /
90 rows selected.
Elapsed: 00:00:00.25
Statistics
----------------------------------------------------------
13 recursive calls
0 db block gets
16768 consistent gets
0 physical reads
128 redo size
4689 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
455 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
7 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
90 rows processed
SQL> /
90 rows selected.
Elapsed: 00:00:00.40
Statistics
----------------------------------------------------------
13 recursive calls
0 db block gets
16515 consistent gets
0 physical reads
0 redo size
4689 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
455 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
7 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
90 rows processed
SQL> /
90 rows selected.
Elapsed: 00:00:00.34
Statistics
----------------------------------------------------------
13 recursive calls
0 db block gets
16046 consistent gets
0 physical reads
0 redo size
4689 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
455 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
7 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
90 rows processed
SQL> /
90 rows selected.
Elapsed: 00:00:00.34
Statistics
----------------------------------------------------------
13 recursive calls
0 db block gets
19300 consistent gets
0 physical reads
1856 redo size
4689 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
455 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
7 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
90 rows processed
SQL> /
90 rows selected.
Elapsed: 00:00:02.92
Statistics
----------------------------------------------------------
13 recursive calls
0 db block gets
19860 consistent gets
0 physical reads
1216 redo size
4689 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
455 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
7 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
90 rows processed
SQL> /
90 rows selected.
Elapsed: 00:00:00.45
Statistics
----------------------------------------------------------
13 recursive calls
0 db block gets
15569 consistent gets
0 physical reads
0 redo size
4689 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
455 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
7 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
90 rows processed
SQL> /
90 rows selected.
Elapsed: 00:00:00.42
Statistics
----------------------------------------------------------
13 recursive calls
0 db block gets
15120 consistent gets
0 physical reads
0 redo size
4689 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
455 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
7 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
90 rows processed
SQL> /
90 rows selected.
Elapsed: 00:00:00.21
Statistics
----------------------------------------------------------
13 recursive calls
0 db block gets
17201 consistent gets
0 physical reads
0 redo size
4689 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
455 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
7 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
90 rows processed
SQL> /
90 rows selected.
Elapsed: 00:00:00.14
Statistics
----------------------------------------------------------
13 recursive calls
0 db block gets
18365 consistent gets
0 physical reads
384 redo size
4689 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
455 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
7 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
90 rows processed
SQL> /
90 rows selected.
Elapsed: 00:00:00.59
Statistics
----------------------------------------------------------
13 recursive calls
0 db block gets
17998 consistent gets
0 physical reads
0 redo size
4689 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
455 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
7 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
90 rows processed
SQL> /
90 rows selected.
Elapsed: 00:00:00.29
Statistics
----------------------------------------------------------
13 recursive calls
0 db block gets
14515 consistent gets
0 physical reads
0 redo size
4689 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
455 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
7 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
90 rows processed
SQL> /
90 rows selected.
Elapsed: 00:00:00.11
Statistics
----------------------------------------------------------
13 recursive calls
0 db block gets
15595 consistent gets
0 physical reads
704 redo size
4689 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
455 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
7 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
90 rows processed
SQL> /
90 rows selected.
Elapsed: 00:00:00.23
Statistics
----------------------------------------------------------
13 recursive calls
0 db block gets
15675 consistent gets
0 physical reads
768 redo size
4689 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
455 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
7 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
90 rows processed
SQL> /
90 rows selected.
Elapsed: 00:00:00.20
Statistics
----------------------------------------------------------
13 recursive calls
0 db block gets
15584 consistent gets
0 physical reads
0 redo size
4689 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
455 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
7 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
90 rows processed
SQL> /
90 rows selected.
Elapsed: 00:00:00.14
Statistics
----------------------------------------------------------
13 recursive calls
0 db block gets
18380 consistent gets
0 physical reads
1344 redo size
4689 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
455 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
7 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
90 rows processed
SQL>
從上面的測(cè)試不難看出，對(duì)于DML操作頻繁的話，對(duì)全文索引來說，還是有較大的影響的。
SQL> begin
2 for i in 1 .. 15000 loop
3 if mod(i, 2) = 0 then
4 update docs
5 set owner = 'google'
6 where id = i
7 and id > 50000
8 and id < 10000;
9 commit;
10 end if;
11 end loop;
12 commit;
13 end;
14 /
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
Elapsed: 00:00:02.25
SQL> exec ctx_ddl.optimize_index('idx_docs','rebuild') ;
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
Elapsed: 00:00:02.84
SQL> begin
2 for i in 1 .. 15000 loop
3 if mod(i, 2) = 0 then
4 update docs
5 set owner = 'baidu'
6 where id = i
7 and id > 50000
8 and id < 10000;
9 commit;
10 end if;
11 end loop;
12 commit;
13 end;
14 /
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
Elapsed: 00:00:02.23
SQL> exec ctx_ddl.optimize_index('idx_docs','FULL') ;
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
Elapsed: 00:00:00.45
SQL>
SQL> begin
2 for i in 1..10000 loop
3 INSERT INTO docs(id, text) VALUES(seq_docs.NEXTVAL, 'http://www.killdb.com/');
4 INSERT INTO docs(id, text) VALUES(seq_docs.NEXTVAL, 'http://www.killdb.com/?p=210');
5 INSERT INTO docs(id, text) VALUES(seq_docs.NEXTVAL, 'http://www.killdb.com/?p=216');
6 INSERT INTO docs(id, text) VALUES(seq_docs.NEXTVAL, 'http://www.killdb.com/?p=201');
7 INSERT INTO docs(id, text) VALUES(seq_docs.NEXTVAL, 'http://www.killdb.com/?p=196');
8 INSERT INTO docs(id, text) VALUES(seq_docs.NEXTVAL, 'http://www.killdb.com/?p=219');
9 INSERT INTO docs(id, text) VALUES(seq_docs.NEXTVAL, 'http://www.killdb.com/?p=205');
10 INSERT INTO docs(id, text) VALUES(seq_docs.NEXTVAL, 'http://www.killdb.com/?p=206');
11 INSERT INTO docs(id, text) VALUES(seq_docs.NEXTVAL, 'http://www.killdb.com/?p=207');
12 INSERT INTO docs(id, text) VALUES(seq_docs.NEXTVAL, 'http://www.killdb.com/?p=199');
13 INSERT INTO docs(id, text) VALUES(seq_docs.NEXTVAL, 'http://www.killdb.com/?p=208');
14 commit;
15 end loop;
16 end;
17 /
begin
*
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-29875: failed in the execution of the ODCIINDEXINSERT routine
ORA-20000: Oracle Text error:
DRG-50857: oracle error in textindexmethods.ODCIIndexInsert
ORA-00604: error occurred at recursive SQL level 2
ORA-01013: user requested cancel of current operation
ORA-06512: at "CTXSYS.DRUE", line 160
ORA-06512: at "CTXSYS.TEXTINDEXMETHODS", line 633
ORA-06512: at line 13
Elapsed: 00:01:09.73
SQL> select count(*) from docs;
COUNT(*)
----------
138898
Elapsed: 00:00:00.35
SQL> exec ctx_ddl.optimize_index('idx_docs','FULL') ;
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
Elapsed: 00:00:00.48
SQL> begin
2 for i in 1..10000 loop
3 INSERT INTO docs(id, text) VALUES(seq_docs.NEXTVAL, 'http://www.killdb.com/');
4 INSERT INTO docs(id, text) VALUES(seq_docs.NEXTVAL, 'http://www.killdb.com/?p=210');
5 INSERT INTO docs(id, text) VALUES(seq_docs.NEXTVAL, 'http://www.killdb.com/?p=216');
6 INSERT INTO docs(id, text) VALUES(seq_docs.NEXTVAL, 'http://www.killdb.com/?p=201');
7 INSERT INTO docs(id, text) VALUES(seq_docs.NEXTVAL, 'http://www.killdb.com/?p=196');
8 INSERT INTO docs(id, text) VALUES(seq_docs.NEXTVAL, 'http://www.killdb.com/?p=219');
9 INSERT INTO docs(id, text) VALUES(seq_docs.NEXTVAL, 'http://www.killdb.com/?p=205');
10 INSERT INTO docs(id, text) VALUES(seq_docs.NEXTVAL, 'http://www.killdb.com/?p=206');
11 INSERT INTO docs(id, text) VALUES(seq_docs.NEXTVAL, 'http://www.killdb.com/?p=207');
12 INSERT INTO docs(id, text) VALUES(seq_docs.NEXTVAL, 'http://www.killdb.com/?p=199');
13 INSERT INTO docs(id, text) VALUES(seq_docs.NEXTVAL, 'http://www.killdb.com/?p=208');
14 commit;
15 end loop;
16 end;
17 /
begin
*
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-29875: failed in the execution of the ODCIINDEXINSERT routine
ORA-20000: Oracle Text error:
DRG-50857: oracle error in textindexmethods.ODCIIndexInsert
ORA-01013: user requested cancel of current operation
ORA-06512: at "CTXSYS.DRUE", line 160
ORA-06512: at "CTXSYS.TEXTINDEXMETHODS", line 633
ORA-06512: at line 12
Elapsed: 00:01:06.17
SQL> exec ctx_ddl.optimize_index('idx_docs','rebuild') ;
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
Elapsed: 00:00:02.09
SQL> select count(*) from docs;
COUNT(*)
----------
156091
Elapsed: 00:00:00.01
SQL>
有人說優(yōu)化index的時(shí)候，使用rebuild比full快很多，但是我測(cè)試恰恰相反，不知道為啥。
最后總結(jié)下：
1. DML操作較為頻繁表，對(duì)全文索引一定影響，但是如果說必須使用該功能，那么也沒辦法,
2. 至于說為什么有一定影響，其實(shí)原理都一樣的，因?yàn)檫壿嬜x的消耗會(huì)增加，必然影響性能。
該功能是從oracle 9i引入的，10g，11g都分別有一定的改變，下一篇文章將會(huì)進(jìn)行描述。 | 
免費(fèi)注冊(cè)
發(fā)表于 2011-12-22 08:54